The story...
My four siblings and I lived closely together. Each family member seemed to provide something that other family members lacked. Some took on a role that partly filled a group need: Planner, Encourager, Tester, Teacher, Story Teller, Helper, Organizer, Server, Project Leader, Decision Maker, Giver, Doer etc. Maybe that means we were a bit dysfunctional when one of the family members was gone for a period of time? I expect that we each flexed our style in order to recover some of the lost value of our missing sibling. It's frustrating to see siblings compare each other to evaluate who is the "best" or to try to fulfill a "best" image that the family has conjured up. It seems better to appreciate the value of the "we" and enjoy each other just as they are. It's a good thing to be okay with who you are - this state of well being seems like a sound foundation for continual growth within the "good life."
It would be a shame if there was a family code that encouraged all members to live, think and act in similar ways according to a "best" standard. "If I could just fix _____ then I'd be okay" - ugh.
People new to the only church in town would learn about the Body of Christ and how people are given unique characteristics, talents, and gifts in order to better form God's called out group of people according to His will (1 Corinthians 12). Each person would be valued and offered the opportunity to engage in the church community. The church would be a place where people would go to serve their role in something bigger and better than any one person could possibly do or be.
Just for today...
"Too often my memory has given me sadness, bringing back past hurt and shame. But now I can use my memory to see the progress I have made and to know the joy of gratitude." Courage to Change (p. 262)
No comments:
Post a Comment